For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and forum.pinoo.com.tr it has radiant evaluations.
Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It simulates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.
Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.
There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.
I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any more copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and joy".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.
He hopes to broaden his variety, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.
It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.
"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.
"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."
In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.
"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative functions must be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful however let's construct it morally and relatively."
OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.
The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".
He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and surgiteams.com logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.
"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is undermining one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague pledge of development."
A federal government representative said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI developers."
Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.
But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.
This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it need to be paying for it.
If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.
As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.
But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure the length of time I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.
Outside the UK? Register here.
1
How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives
cynthiadelargi edited this page 2025-02-02 10:58:44 +00:00